|
Some personal comments. At this point I feel that I have to give a closer explanation of my
purpose with this homepage. First I would like to draw your attention to the 1971
investigations in England and to an unappreciated (for reasons which I have
already mentioned) and seemingly forgotten documentation of the Voice
Phenomenon. And I also would like to ask: What is the real question? Is it,
even with its high contents of technical problems, a purely technical problem
at all? And what is the role of the (perhaps?) involved
biological/psychological system - the experimentator? But I must admit that my motive is also personal and not purely
idealistic. I offer no apology for this. I spent several years on those
investigations. The costs were both financial and personal, and I was the one
who paid both sorts of bills. In addition, I know that I have really got
results worthy of preservation. It would be a pity if all that should be
simply discarded. The scientific establishment mostly refuse to deal with my research.
Why? It's my conviction that the most important cause of this reluctance is
the nature of the phenomenon: The manifestation as human voices. But perhaps
it could help if one now called the phenomenon for what it really is: Inteligently
controled computer aided voice-like artefacts. But - I also must admit that I am not totally without understanding of
such an attitude. As already previous mentioned the Voice Phenomenon has
(sometimes under names as EVP or Transcommunication) during several years
been misused and in the hands of charlatans mixed up with ravings such as New
Age-religions, flying saucers, contact with other (unknown) planets etc. in a
way that had made it unacceptable for any scientific recognition. What can be
done in such an doubtful situation? Just ask for an acceptable documentation.
If such one is refused - forget it ! Nevertheless - I think that somewhere there still must be some independent,
unbiased and open minded institutes, societies, some physicist, electronic or
computer professionals interested in a serious research in this field.
Experts which could folow up and continue my investigations. And I also
always welcome them to give my results a fair test - and that is the main
motive for this homepage. On the other hand.... If I risk a repetition of what 1971 happened in
England where the meddling from some technical totally incompetent persons
and groups (mainly with parapsychological-spiritualistic background) spoiled
any chance for a scientific acceptable further investigation - then I simply
must accept that I have wasted my time. I know that this statement may reduce my possible contacts with
perhaps more then 95%. Never mind - it's the remaining small group - even if
it should be less then 5% *) - which I should be very pleased to hear from. Here at the end of these long (some may say all to long) homepage
please let me repeat the ending lines from the introduction at the very
beginning: "....I am sure you may find something of interest - or at
least something you can disagree with. *) After more then two years I would say 0,05% ------------------ Peter Stein |